Geoffrey A. Moore's most recent book,
Escape Velocity: Free Your Company's Future from the Pull of the Past, is primarily about how to position a company to take best advanatage of the external and internal forces that bear on its current and future value and viability. It's a good book -- one that every product manager in a high-tech company should read, but what caught my attention on first read-through was an almost off-hand reference to the
leadership /
management opposition:
Asymmetrical bets [sacrificing smaller short-term gains for a larger mid-term return] are the foundation for creating company power, putting in high relief the distinction between leadership and management. Managers resist asymmetrical bets for a host of good reasons: They are both inequitable and socially unpopular. They are hard for shared services organizations to support. They entail taking high-visibility (and potentially career-limiting) risks. They run roughshod over personal loyalties. They stretch the organization far beyond the limits of its comfort zone. They are departures from the norm.
Leaders acknowledge all of the above, but they still persist in making asymmetrical bets, also for a host of good reasons: They want the power to win. They are more externally than internally focused. They want to adapt the company to the market, not the other way around. They want to make a difference. They want to make sure that sacrifices -- which are inevitable in any strategy -- are made in a worthwhile cause.
Moore advocates a lead-first, manage-second philosophy. That is, you need to reference the activities inside the company against external realities and allocate your resources accordingly. The alternative is wishful thinking -- hoping that your internal priorities will somehow, magically, match up with external demand.
The leadership vs. management debate is important for BI platform management as well.
APOS delivers
well managed BI, but we also promote what we call
progressive BI. The most succinct way of summarizing the difference between the two is that it is essentially the difference between management and leadership.
Leadership vs. Management
Much has been written
about the difference between leadership and management, and we often see the
two painted as irreconcilable opposites. The world of business, with all its
shades of gray, really has no place for such absolute oppositions. Leaders have
to manage, and managers have to lead, but the two activities can trigger some
real
cognitive dissonance.
The cognitive
dissonance arises mostly in relation to the idea of risk. Our management side
is trained to be risk-averse. Steady as she goes; don't rock the boat; the
status quo has been good to us. However, to lead, we need to embrace risk as
the necessary travelling companion of opportunity, and to understand that the
benefits of the status quo won't last forever.
According to Moore,
management views the world from the inside out, while leadership views the
world from the outside in. That is, our management side wants to fit the
exterior reality to our operating plan, while our leadership side wants to mold
the operating plan to fit the exterior reality.
Well Managed BI vs. Progressive BI
How does this all
relate to APOS well managed BI solutions? Well, as I said earlier, the
difference between well managed BI and progressive BI is the difference between
management and leadership.
APOS delivers well
managed BI. We do so through solutions that simplify, automate, enhance and
extend the administration and management of your BI platform. We look at the
practice of BI within an organization in the light of a capability maturity
model, which has three levels:
- Curative -- the level of least maturity; your technologists are primarily reacting
to events, and performing labor-intensive fixes.
- Preventive -- you have developed deep system introspection and can anticipate and act
to eliminate problems and bottlenecks.
- Progressive -- you have achieved well managed BI and are now
proactive in finding new applications and ROI for your BI platform.
We do not deliver
progressive BI -- that's up to you to achieve on your own initiative. But we do
enable progressive BI by taking your curative and preventive worries away, and
by supplying solutions that you can use to implement advanced best practices in
publishing and geospatial analytics, thus improving the distribution and
communication of information within your organization. We make your BI platform
management easier, so you can look outside of it proactively to find
opportunities that serve the larger needs of your organization.
Chances are your BI platform
is relatively robust from an IT point of view, and that its architecture and
infrastructure are capable of supporting new applications. When you implement
APOS solutions, you give yourself the platform on which to become proactive,
develop new BI applications, and increase the ROI on your BI solution.
Gravity, Inertia and Resource
Allocation
The overarching metaphor
of
Escape Velocity is gravity. "Escape
velocity" is the speed needed to break free from a gravitational field
without further propulsion (
Wikipedia). The pull of the past in the book's subtitle
equates gravitational forces with the organization's past success. The greater
the past success, the greater the inertia preventing the company from escaping
the pull of the past and achieving new successes.
Moore cites Sir Isaac
Newton, developer of the theory of gravity, on page 1:
Newton taught us several centuries ago in his first law of motion, the
one that covers inertia, that an object at rest tends to stay at rest and an
object in motion tends to continue in the direction in which it is currently
moving. The same goes for resource allocation.
And so the theme is
set: we need to break free from the past to embrace the future. Since budgets
are expressions of priorities, it is in resource allocation that this
expression will be seen.
The Journey from Well Managed BI to
Progressive BI
Don't let inertia
stall your journey.
Much like Moore's
escape from the pull of the past, the journey from well managed BI to
progressive BI is about escaping "the way we always do things around
here." If your destination is progressive BI, then you need to be aware of
the journey, and not just the steps. You can take care of your curative needs,
but if you don't have somewhere to focus those newly liberated resources, you
will simply lose them.
If you were primarily
concerned with reducing headcounts, then congratulations, your job is done.
You're now doing more with less.
But
if your goal is to move through preventive BI to progressive BI, and to realize
greater ROI from your BI deployment, you need to be proactively redeploying
your resources as soon as they have escaped curative mode.
